search: results update below


browse funds: selections are stored



recently rated:

Rated by 17
1.9
 

top rated funds:

Rated by 12
4.1

Rated by 12
4.0
 

Rated by 11
4.0
 

Rated by 15
4.0

Rated by 21
4.0

Rated by 41
3.9

Rated by 11
3.8

Rated by 44
3.8

Rated by 106
3.8

Rated by 32
3.8

Rated by 32
3.8

Rated by 64
3.7

Rated by 23
3.7

Rated by 27
3.7

Rated by 11
3.6

Rated by 18
3.6

Rated by 10
3.6
 

Rated by 62
3.6

Rated by 21
3.5

Rated by 12
3.5
 

Rated by 30
3.5

Rated by 28
3.4

Rated by 19
3.4

Rated by 14
3.4
 

Rated by 49
3.4
 

Rated by 16
3.4
 

Rated by 10
3.4

Rated by 13
3.4

Rated by 16
3.4

Rated by 60
3.4

Please take a moment and make a financial contribution to TheFunded. If we have helped you, help us with resources to further grow the both the site and our entrepreneur training program, The Founder Institute.

Y Combinator

Firm Rating:

Rated 4.0 / 5.0 by 11
Track
Record
4.3
Operating
Competence
4.3
Pitching
Efficiency
4.1
Favorable
Deal Terms
3.0
Execution
Assistance
4.2

Firm Homepage:

FIRM OVERVIEW: Very Small Angels based out of Mountain View, 94041 (US West)

TEAM MEMBERS:

5
Agree
2
Disagree

Ideas Trump Experience

Fund: Y Combinator

Posted by Anonymous on 2008-08-28

PUBLIC:

Y Combinator has a model that works â€" for them. They trade a small amount of cash (~$25,000) for a significant amount of equity (~5%) in companies that they can flip relatively quickly. They are looking for applications/services, not necessarily businesses. They invest in ideas, not necessarily teams.

PRIVATE: Members Only (519 Characters)

0
Agree
1
Disagree

Y Combinator Starts Seeding Ideas to Startups

Fund: Y Combinator

Posted by goodform on 2009-08-17

8
Agree
1
Disagree

Nice People, Niched Auditory

Fund: Y Combinator

Posted by Anonymous on 2008-05-02

PUBLIC:

The YC are all nice, but pretty subjective people. They say they are looking for teams, but not ideas. However, they interview teams FOR ideas. There are great teams with exciting management and engineering backgrounds being declined because of ideas.

PRIVATE: Members Only (1052 Characters)

0
Agree
0
Disagree

The Real Deal

Fund: Y Combinator

Posted by ayfounder on 2014-03-21

PUBLIC:

Fantastic experience. Working with these guys was and is life changing. I would absolutely do it again, and I've already got an exit.

PRIVATE: Members Only

0
Agree
0
Disagree

Surprisingly Mediocre. Just a Brand These Days.

Fund: Y Combinator

Posted by Anonymous on 2014-03-01

PUBLIC:

The batch sizes are humongous now (70+) so you don't get that much helpful energy at the Tuesday dinners. It's more like a conference than a party.

Previously, I thought YC was a for-sure good use of time. Now, I am not so sure.

PRIVATE: Members Only

1
Agree
0
Disagree

Y Combinator is the Best Combinator!

Fund: Y Combinator

Posted by Anonymous on 2011-08-31

PUBLIC:

I was familiar with Y Combinator through their portfolio and through their affiliated news aggregator/discussion site "news.ycombinator.com".

The application process casts a much wider net than the average seed investor or angel -- applications are through an online form (2000+ globally in the Summer 2011 batch), narrowed down to about 150 on-site interviews in Mountain View, CA. These interviews are about five minutes long, with the full partnership. A flexible number of groups are accepted (the bar is absolute quality vs. a curve to a specific number), but is roughly 25-50%, so the big filter function is getting an in-person interview.

The YC deal terms, if taken as just cash for equity, are pretty horrible (effectively, a pre-money valuation of around USD 200k-500k). The $150k START Note from SV Angel and Yuri/DST makes it less so, but the value of YC has never been the initial capital provided. Some external criticism has been of these deal terms, but they are largely in-line with other incubators, and coupled with the value-add provided during the YC session and on an ongoing basis by the YC partners and YC alumni, it is an excellent value for most startups. The possible exception would be a startup which has already raised substantial (>$1mm) equity investment and has an extensive network of investors and customers, and even in those cases, the equity taken by YC might raise odds of long-term success.

Another criticism of YC is that it has grown too large -- 64 companies in the Summer 2011 batch. From what YC founders have said, this has not been a problem. The YC partnership has grown, and become even more "full time" for the partners, so each startup receives plenty of assistance. The YC alumni network has continued to grow, with major successes like AirBNB, Dropbox, and Heroku, so the value of that network is substantial as well. The new YC partners are very execution-focused, with specific skills and experience in design, legal, fundraising, and development, broadening the appeal.

YC is fairly biased (through experience) against solo founders, especially those who neither plan to bring in additional cofounders, and especially those who are not developers themselves; they dislike the "idea guy who will hire some outsourced developers to build a site" model of entrepreneurship.

Anyone applying to YC should read Paul Graham's essays (http://www.paulgraham.com/articles.html)

PRIVATE: Members Only (1537 Characters)

0
Agree
0
Disagree

Y Combinator Gets the Sequoia Capital Seal of Approval

Fund: Y Combinator

Posted by Anonymous on 2009-03-16

1
Agree
0
Disagree

Example Terms?

Fund: Y Combinator

Posted by spv on 2008-06-02

PRIVATE: Members Only (136 Characters)