search: results update below


browse funds: selections are stored



recently rated:

Rated by 2
5.0

top rated funds:

Rated by 13
3.4

Rated by 16
3.4

Rated by 60
3.4

Rated by 17
3.4

Rated by 18
3.3

Rated by 39
3.3
 

Rated by 15
3.3

Rated by 10
3.3
 

Rated by 10
3.3

Rated by 38
3.3

Rated by 38
3.3

Rated by 23
3.3

Rated by 38
3.3

Rated by 48
3.3

Rated by 39
3.3

Rated by 34
3.3

Rated by 14
3.3

Rated by 47
3.2
 

Rated by 27
3.2
 

Rated by 10
3.2
 

Rated by 31
3.2

Rated by 33
3.2

Rated by 10
3.2
 

Rated by 51
3.1

Rated by 14
3.1

Rated by 29
3.1

Rated by 42
3.1

Rated by 26
3.1
 

Rated by 14
3.1

Rated by 20
3.1

Please take a moment and make a financial contribution to TheFunded. If we have helped you, help us with resources to further grow the both the site and our entrepreneur training program, The Founder Institute.

Vedanta Capital  CERTIFIED

Firm Rating:

Rated 2.0 / 5.0 by 2
Track
Record
0.0
Operating
Competence
2.0
Pitching
Efficiency
1.0
Favorable
Deal Terms
4.0
Execution
Assistance
1.0

Firm Homepage:

FIRM OVERVIEW: Large Private VC founded in 2006 based out of New York, USA (US East)

FIRM DESCRIPTION: We are a team of investors and entrepreneurs that have been in the business for over two decades. We have started Vedanta Capital to put to work our knowledge, experience and network on behalf of the entrepreneur. Besides helping on operational and general strategic issues, we can help forge strategic partnerships in Europe and Asia. Many of us have worked together for years: our core team used to be the managing team of INVESCO Private Capital. We are investing a new fund, but we are also managing a portfolio of companies that our investors asked us to continue following after we decided to leave INVESCO.

TEAM MEMBERS: Alessandro Piol, Howard Goldstein, Larry Posner, Michael Patterson, Parag Saxena, Shrikant Sathe,

1
Agree
2
Disagree

Mixed Messages

Fund: Vedanta Capital

Posted by anonymous on 2007-09-19

PUBLIC:

Were told they loved us in the first pitch and in the second meeting everything went apparently equally well followed by a seemingly superficial analysis to be then told no.

PRIVATE: Members Only (150 Characters)