search: results update below


browse funds: selections are stored



recently rated:

Rated by 2
5.0

top rated funds:

Rated by 19
2.1

Rated by 15
2.1
 

Rated by 30
2.0
 

Rated by 13
2.0
 

Rated by 10
2.0

Rated by 46
1.9
 

Rated by 15
1.8
 

Rated by 11
1.8
 

Rated by 10
1.6
 

Rated by 15
1.1

Rated by 2
5.0

Rated by 1
5.0
 

Rated by 1
5.0
 

Rated by 1
5.0
 

Rated by 1
5.0

Rated by 1
5.0

Rated by 1
5.0
 

Rated by 1
5.0
 

Rated by 3
5.0
 

Rated by 1
5.0
 

Rated by 1
5.0
 

Rated by 1
5.0
 

Rated by 2
4.9

Rated by 5
4.9
 

Rated by 1
4.8

Rated by 1
4.8
 

Rated by 3
4.8

Rated by 1
4.8
 

Rated by 1
4.8

Rated by 1
4.8
 

Please take a moment and make a financial contribution to TheFunded. If we have helped you, help us with resources to further grow the both the site and our entrepreneur training program, The Founder Institute.

Pangaea Ventures

Firm Rating:

Rated 3.6 / 5.0 by 2
Track
Record
4.5
Operating
Competence
3.0
Pitching
Efficiency
2.5
Favorable
Deal Terms
4.0
Execution
Assistance
4.0

Firm Homepage:

FIRM OVERVIEW: Small Private VC founded in 2000 based out of Vancouver, Canada (Canada)

TEAM MEMBERS: Calvin Yee, Christian Erickson, Purnesh Seegopaul,

0
Agree
0
Disagree

Inexlicably Turned Down

Fund: Pangaea Ventures

Posted by chaver4u on 2012-08-24

PUBLIC:

This is one of those VCs that hype themselves with great capability and strategy statements on their website. I was referred by a Dutch VC that Pangaea was the right fit for us. Comparing their terms, goals and expectations with ours, this was correct.

After an initial contact, I received a very positive message, and a pitch via Skype was arranged. I was given 15 minutes.

Pitched to Keith Gillard (general partner) via Skype for 66 (!) minutes. Great interest, many questions, which I could all answer. My pitch was listened to AND well received, lauding our product, technology, expertise, market potentials, business model, you name it. Asked for follow-up material and details, which I sent.

So you think you are on the right track. Wrong!
.......total silence.

After several kind emails asking for the status, and if more info was needed, finally 2 months later I received a curt email that we were not a "hot deal". Whatever that means. By the way, our product is produced at 1500° C....pretty hot ;-)

I kindly asked to explain why the sudden change of mind, and what this "not a hot deal" means, but got no answer.

I am a big boy and can stomach rejection quite well, but if if this comes with a paucity of communications, then one should wonder the level of the person's professionalism you openly negotiate with. Being civil never killed anybody.

PRIVATE: Members Only (58 Characters)