search: results update below


browse funds: selections are stored


recently rated:

Rated by 6
1.9
 

top rated funds:

Rated by 27
4.0

Rated by 14
3.9

Rated by 28
3.8

Rated by 81
3.8

Rated by 14
3.7

Rated by 26
3.6

Rated by 12
3.6
 

Rated by 42
3.6

Rated by 15
3.6

Rated by 13
3.6

Rated by 36
3.5
 

Rated by 20
3.5
 

Rated by 21
3.5

Rated by 33
3.5

Rated by 34
3.4

Rated by 18
3.4
 

Rated by 10
3.4
 

Rated by 41
3.4

Rated by 10
3.3

Rated by 15
3.3
 

Rated by 30
3.3
 

Rated by 22
3.3

Rated by 12
3.3

Rated by 34
3.3
 

Rated by 21
3.3

Rated by 12
3.3
 

Rated by 32
3.3

Rated by 24
3.3

Rated by 29
3.2
 

Rated by 19
3.2

Applied Ventures LLC  CERTIFIED

Firm Rating:

Rated 2.4 / 5.0 by 4
Track
Record
1.0
Operating
Competence
1.0
Pitching
Efficiency
1.0
Favorable
Deal Terms
4.0
Execution
Assistance
5.0

Firm Homepage: (by Snap.com)

FIRM OVERVIEW: Medium Strategic founded in 2005 based out of Santa Clara, USA (US West)

FIRM DESCRIPTION: AV is an evergreen fund that invests in early stage companies developing disruptive technologies in energy, semiconductor processing and display applications.

TEAM MEMBERS: Annette Finsterbusch, J. Christopher Moran, Michele Klein, Pravin Narwankar,

FUND NEWS: More / RSS by Orglex

0
Agree
1
Disagree

Applied Is Very Good To Work With

Fund: Applied Ventures LLC

Posted by anonymous on 2007-09-18

PUBLIC:

My experience with Applied has been very good in terms of the integrity and hard work of the partner I have worked with as well as in Applied's willingness to really pitch in and help my company once I became part of their portfolio.

PRIVATE: Members Only (806 Characters)

2
Agree
0
Disagree

Only Want Your Technology For Free

Fund: Applied Ventures LLC

Posted by anonymous on 2007-09-07

PUBLIC:

PRIVATE: Members Only (298 Characters)

2
Agree
0
Disagree

Talk About Hoops

Fund: Applied Ventures LLC

Posted by anonymous on 2007-09-06

PUBLIC:

Responsiveness is not very good with this fund, I found the contacts we had to be pleasant enough but in initial diligence calls the representatives they got to ask us intelligent questions neither knew the area we were addressing nor could keep their opinions of the industry to themselves, causing severe disruption to the meeting agenda and I was further disappointed by Applied's inability to control the meeting. The process was very drawn out even to get to the stage where qualified interest could be determined.

PRIVATE: Members Only (558 Characters)

2
Agree
0
Disagree

Kafka Like Experience

Fund: Applied Ventures LLC

Posted by konfrubila on 2007-09-03

PUBLIC:

Very slow and bureaucratic...

PRIVATE: Members Only