search: results update below


browse funds: selections are stored



recently rated:

Rated by 12
2.5

top rated funds:

Rated by 1
4.6
 

Rated by 3
4.6

Rated by 1
4.6
 

Rated by 1
4.6
 

Rated by 1
4.6
 

Rated by 3
4.6

Rated by 2
4.6
 

Rated by 6
4.5
 

Rated by 1
4.5

Rated by 4
4.5

Rated by 3
4.5
 

Rated by 4
4.5

Rated by 2
4.5
 

Rated by 4
4.5

Rated by 3
4.5
 

Rated by 8
4.5
 

Rated by 6
4.5

Rated by 1
4.5
 

Rated by 4
4.5

Rated by 1
4.4

Rated by 1
4.4
 

Rated by 7
4.4
 

Rated by 1
4.4
 

Rated by 1
4.4
 

Rated by 1
4.4
 

Rated by 1
4.4
 

Rated by 1
4.4
 

Rated by 2
4.4
 

Rated by 1
4.4
 

Rated by 1
4.4
 

Please take a moment and make a financial contribution to TheFunded. If we have helped you, help us with resources to further grow the both the site and our entrepreneur training program, The Founder Institute.

Welcome

TheFunded.com is an online community of over 20,000 CEOs, Founders and entrepreneurs to discuss fundraising, rate and review angel investors and venture capitalists, and discuss strategies to grow a startup business. Enjoy the site, and be sure to join us at our Founder Showcase events to meet the community.

  Sign-up for Membership  

TAGS: Director (1)   shareholders (1)   Lead (1)   Latin America (1)   pricing (2)    More
NEW SHOWCASE: zero2infinity: Clean-tech answer to the Space Tourism demand. (CleanTech/Energy)

0
Agree
0
Disagree

Great Feedback and Coaching

Fund: Leapfrog Ventures

Posted by Simon on 2013-12-12

PUBLIC:

My company is outside the core of Leapfrog Ventures and normally I would not approach such a VC. However, I was attracted by having two principals who are entrepreneurs and MIT engineers. ie I felt these partners are the type that truly earned their stripes and they are not some green finance geeks who could not manage the local 7-11 yet acts like he is God's gift to Venture Financing (you know the type I am describing). I was pleasantly surprised to get a quick response indicating that this was outside their core (which of course I already knew). However, knowing my company is outside their core, I thought that would be a good place to practice the pitch and ask some feedback. I was pleasantly surprised that Peter agreed to meet me for an hour and listen to the pitch and provide feedback. Within about 24 hours of initial contact, I met Peter in Menlo Park. He listened to the pitch attentively and provided some great feedback on the pitch, on the story, on what is missing. He provided some suggestions on addressing the (internal) questions that a VC would have listening to the pitch that I needed to proactively address. Most VC's don't even offer any feedback and Pete not only offered feedback but also provided some coaching and good advice. Truly you can tell that he is a class act. To top it all, he took the time to do this in mid December when everyone is usually really pressed for time. Bottom line, this is a super classy VC and I would highly recommend Leapfrog

PRIVATE: Members Only (51 Characters)

1
Agree
3
Disagree

Angellist the Wrong Answer to the Early Stage Problem

TheFunded.com Discussion

Posted by Anonymous on 2013-12-12

1
Agree
0
Disagree

Sundeep is the Absolutely Awful

Fund: Felicis Ventures

Posted by Anonymous on 2013-12-11

PUBLIC:

While introduced to Aydin, I met with Sundeep. Out of 100+ VC conversations I've had, he was literally the absolute worst. Arrogant and disrespectful. Talked a LOT more than he listened. And in our one hour meeting came across as if he was trying to prove he's the smartest guy in the room. His behavior was especially strange because he had very little domain expertise in our area, yet rather than listening, was espousing strong opinions. In summary, the guy came across like a total clown. Really reflects poorly on Aydin personally, who seems to have a great reputation. If someone can figure out why he's on the team, I'd love to know, if only to understand how Aydin made the decision to hire him.

PRIVATE: Members Only

0
Agree
0
Disagree

Any Angle/VC Resources for Non Tech Companies?

TheFunded.com Discussion

Posted by Anonymous on 2013-12-11

2
Agree
0
Disagree

Worst Experience

Fund: Khosla Ventures

Posted by voyager1 on 2013-12-11

PUBLIC:

My company just pitched to dozens in VCs in the valley. We received substantial backing from numerous establish VCs.

Looking back, my worst experience was with Euan at Kholsa. He was very late to the meeting, and he had to leave early too. In addition, he spent the entire meeting on his cell phone, occasionally looking up to murmur off things about Kholsa's rigid theses. He went on and on about how we didn't send him our deck ahead of time.

At least he gave us a curt pass email after the meeting -- and another forced request for us to send over our full deck.

I've spoken with many other credible startups that have pitched to Euan / Kholsa. It sounds like this is a pattern. Under no circumstances will we ever take money from these guys. Also, I hear that Vinod is a holy terror.

PRIVATE: Members Only

0
Agree
0
Disagree

Paid Q&A Site Building Critical Mass

TheFunded.com Discussion

Posted by Anonymous on 2013-12-10

0
Agree
1
Disagree

Good Experience From Pitch to Close

Fund: Intel Capital

Posted by SecurityEntrepreneur on 2013-12-09

PUBLIC:

When started first to discuss with Intel Capital, I was skeptical. Concerns about being "too corporate", "difficult to negotiate with and close" etc were some inputs I received.
I was pleasantly surprised.
The Director assigned to us was top notch. He got the business and opportunity quickly and was able to connect with appropriate parties in Intel Corporate quickly to get feedback and assess possible business synergy.
Negotiation was professional, reasonable and timely. No "playing games" or "corporate stuff". Main somewhat unique requirement was an Observer seat on the board, which was ok with us.
Deal terms were fair. From several term sheets provided by other firms, Intel's was not the best but above the median.
We ended up closing with them on the round - due to combination of the individual director assigned, the fair terms and the brand/strategic value (which was important to our security related business).

A year+ into the relationship, ongoing work with the Intel rep is very well. We received several good introductions to Intel business partners for business development as well as multiple strong referrals to executive candidates for positions we were looking for. Reasonable oversight via board observer seat as well as very good sounding board as we discuss strategy.

Overall - very happy with the decision to partner with Intel Capital.

PRIVATE: Members Only (95 Characters)

0
Agree
0
Disagree

Goldman Sachs Principal and Strategic Investments

TheFunded.com Discussion

Posted by Anonymous on 2013-12-09

0
Agree
1
Disagree

Versata/Trilogy Legit Acquirer?

TheFunded.com Discussion

Posted by Anonymous on 2013-12-09

0
Agree
0
Disagree

Comparing the Early Stagemarketplace to Angellist

TheFunded.com Discussion

Posted by Anonymous on 2013-12-08

0
Agree
0
Disagree

Madison Street Capital

TheFunded.com Discussion

Posted by Anonymous on 2013-12-06

0
Agree
0
Disagree

Great Interview with Angel List Founder

TheFunded.com Discussion

Posted by Anonymous on 2013-12-04

0
Agree
0
Disagree

Ever Heard of Crm International (Capital Resource Management)?

TheFunded.com Discussion

Posted by Anonymous on 2013-12-03

0
Agree
0
Disagree

How to Approach Second Meeting with Potential Lead Angel Investor (Seed Round)?

TheFunded.com Discussion

Posted by Anonymous on 2013-12-03

0
Agree
0
Disagree

Is There a VC Directory Indexed by Investment Focus?

TheFunded.com Open Letter

Posted by raul_oneredcar on 2013-12-03

PUBLIC:

How would we know which VCs to pitch once we have a proof-of-concept in Storage and/or Networking?

0
Agree
0
Disagree

Don't Bother with Mitch Lasky

Fund: Benchmark Capital

Posted by Serial Entrepreneur on 2013-12-02

PUBLIC:

Mitch gives a first impression of being a polished and informed professional. He's really a quick flip guy who's constantly meddling in operations.

He's rumored to be transferring his work to Bill Gurley.

PRIVATE: Members Only (111 Characters)

0
Agree
0
Disagree

Anyone Work with Gallatin Equity?

TheFunded.com Discussion

Posted by Anonymous on 2013-12-01

0
Agree
0
Disagree

VC Involvement with Companies Listed Venture Exchanges

TheFunded.com Discussion

Posted by Anonymous on 2013-11-27

1
Agree
1
Disagree

Great Experience Prompt, Friendly, Straight, Good Knowledge of Saa S

Fund: Bain Capital Ventures

Posted by Anonymous on 2013-11-25

PUBLIC:

It took less than 3 months to close the deal from the initial conversation to money at the bank. We were talking to others and ready for due diligence, but it's still a good time-frame for a serious round.

The experience was highly positive, and continues to be such.

PRIVATE: Members Only

0
Agree
0
Disagree

Positive Experience Interesting Alternative

Fund: North Country Angels

Posted by Anonymous on 2013-11-22

PUBLIC:

The meeting was well attended and the attendees appeared to have done their homework. They asked questions that were based on our pitch and were very reasonable next questions. I'd have to say it was a good experience.

PRIVATE: Members Only (217 Characters)

1
Agree
0
Disagree

Good Intro Call

Fund: Trident Capital

Posted by Anonymous on 2013-11-21

PUBLIC:

Was introduced to Evangelos Simoudis knowing we were too small for their firm. Evangelos was on time and quite helpful, listened well. At first he treated me a bit like a new kid, but once I established my bone fides, the conversation turned serious and he treated with me respect; also offered short advice sessions as we grow.

Would definitely consider talking to him again.

PRIVATE: Members Only

2
Agree
0
Disagree

Toxic. Disruptive. Beware

Fund: Cross Atlantic Partners

Posted by Anonymous on 2013-11-19

PRIVATE: Members Only (345 Characters)

0
Agree
0
Disagree

Choose David Verril Over Charlie Cameron if You Can

Fund: Hub Angels

Posted by Do Not Wish to Reveal out of Concern for Retailation on 2013-11-17

PUBLIC:

David Verrill comes across as fair, earnest and thoughtful. It was obvious from the insightful questions he asked in due diligence - in writing, which we appreciated because it gave us the opportunity to provide equally thoughtful answers - that he had read our materials. He then responded with equally thoughtful follow-up questions, and followed-up again a number of weeks later so that he could get an update on our progress. All in all, a very professional approach.

We had a very different experience with Charlie Cameron, who made disrespectful comments in a public setting based on an elevator pitch, which we felt was reckless given his position. More detail for entrepreneurs posted privately.

PRIVATE: Members Only (1188 Characters)

0
Agree
0
Disagree

Struggling Company Big Break Dilemma

TheFunded.com Discussion

Posted by Anonymous on 2013-11-17

0
Agree
0
Disagree

Dealing with Team Being Part Time

TheFunded.com Advice

Posted by Anonymous on 2013-11-16

PUBLIC:

I founded a startup and I have found a team of programmers that only work on it part time as they have to make some money to pay their living costs. Living in a country where equity isn't as valued as in the states it was very hard to find a team to begin with to start working on a no name startup and where funding is not readily available.

I am the only one working on it full time, as a non too technical biz dev person I keep running into problems. While I do customer development and basically have clients waiting on us to deliver (willing to pay), this keeps beeing a stumbling block. They are too slow to deliver and doing a presale is hard to pull off when I even doubt that they can deliver on time. I have them under a vesting scheme with 1 year cliff and it's about half a year into development.
Do not get me wrong, they are professional in what they do and I like them as people.

Discussing joining an accelerator for some seed money and focussed working months in one space to speed things up was met by them with the opinion that they do not think that we have enough of our product yet which isn't true.
We've got some good initial traction and some data that is sellable to establish an early adopter paying model. I'd like to explore my options and a potential scheme of controlling how much they have worked on the code as well as a line of argumentation to either motivate them to step up to the game or slowly show them the door and find a good replacement.

Any advice would be very much appreciated. Thank you.

PRIVATE: Members Only